Ducati Monster Forum

Moto Board => General Monster Forum => Topic started by: macker on June 08, 2008, 10:12:09 AM

Title: That poor s4
Post by: macker on June 08, 2008, 10:12:09 AM
I give the guy credit for the work put in this thing, but come on! who honestly thinks this is a nice bike

(http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/Custom%20Bikes/Monster%20S4%20by%20Ferruccio%20Codutti%20%202.jpg)
(http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/Custom%20Bikes/Monster%20S4%20by%20Ferruccio%20Codutti%20%201.jpg)
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: potomacduc on June 08, 2008, 10:29:11 AM
I don't like the looks, but as a laboratory for new ideas, I tip my hat.  The overall product doesn't work aesthetically, but there are bits I do like visually and I'm always interested in seeing people's attempts at integrating alternative technologies. 
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: PizzaMonster on June 08, 2008, 11:18:55 AM

Where is "the Ron" when you need him?  Now there's an Ugly Duc for him to rant on!!   ;D

It looks like a Ducati Transformer. ;D
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Bun-bun on June 08, 2008, 11:32:48 AM
Wow!











Just, Wow!
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: silentbob on June 08, 2008, 11:50:22 AM
I'd take it.  But I also like this.
(http://www.parttrade.com/Images/Used-Vyrus-Motorcycle-Parts.jpg)

Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: junior varsity on June 08, 2008, 12:29:28 PM
Its no Tesi, but its interesting. I wouldn't buy that one though.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: RichD on June 08, 2008, 01:19:04 PM
An interesting concept for sure!

Kudos to the guy who built it.
Few who criticize it have the skills to make even the first part!

Good job!

Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: DoubleEagle on June 08, 2008, 01:36:45 PM
Yuck ! But I've seen wose...I think.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: junior varsity on June 08, 2008, 01:42:43 PM
i just really don't like the red belt covers and motor. That's not very imaginative, or raw.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: zarn02 on June 08, 2008, 02:46:03 PM
Quote from: ato memphis on June 08, 2008, 01:42:43 PM
i just really don't like the red belt covers and motor. That's not very imaginative, or raw.

[laugh]

i think it's interesting. and not "interesting" as a euphanism for "terrible"... i find it genuinely interesting.

that said, i've no desire to have it.

*recalls a thread on TOB about this bike, and is noticing similar reactions.*
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: blue tiger on June 08, 2008, 02:50:43 PM
I'm getting lightheaded from all the ugliness!!
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: ducatiz on June 08, 2008, 03:03:38 PM
Quote from: ato memphis on June 08, 2008, 01:42:43 PM
i just really don't like the red belt covers and motor. That's not very imaginative, or raw.

oh, yeah, it's the PAINT that is the problem!

[laugh] [laugh]
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: junior varsity on June 08, 2008, 03:35:40 PM
The front 'forks' are pretty neat IMO.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Fox on June 08, 2008, 03:44:55 PM
I like it and would ride it regularly.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Dareduc on June 08, 2008, 04:33:47 PM
I am up for anything inovative and out of the box... the monster was built out of "thinking out of the box." much applause to those who spend their time and MONEY creating these works. Just think of it as a guy who went the EXTRA modding step.   [clap]
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: roy-nexus-6 on June 08, 2008, 06:46:55 PM
The guy has skills, no doubt about it.

But IMO, first and foremost a motorcycle should be just that: a motorcycle. Sure, we all mod our bikes,.. but most/all people wouldn't perform a mod where it undermined stability or handling. I'm looking at the front end of this bike, & thinking it's not going to handle as well as a simple, straightforward handlebar-fork arrangement.

Cheers.  [thumbsup]
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: DY on June 08, 2008, 07:09:09 PM
Since there are no forks, just a front swingarm... I wonder how it turns?  How does it countersteer?
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: SolidSnake3035 on June 08, 2008, 07:12:41 PM
That's really cool, although quite ugly.  I'd be really interested to see it in action.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: junior varsity on June 08, 2008, 07:23:11 PM
Quote from: deweey on June 08, 2008, 07:09:09 PM
Since there are no forks, just a front swingarm... I wonder how it turns?  How does it countersteer?

Works like normal. You turn handlebar, the linkages turn the wheel, so it turns at slow speed and high speed like normal. At least, the Bimota version does, I have been told. I have not been fortunate enough to ride one.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: El Matador on June 08, 2008, 09:54:04 PM
I would actually totally rock that. I think it's awesome except for the red belt covers and engine cover. I would paint  that ASAP.

As an ME student I find the front end to be farking awesome, I have always loved the Tesi for it, and this engineering marvel does the same for me.

My very humble foraging into making custom parts makes me stand in awe of all the time and efforts that have gone into that particular machine. Maybe that's why I like it, I don't find it aesthetically beautiful, but I love the concept and I would love to have a machine that took so much pain and efforts to build..
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Big Troubled Bear on June 09, 2008, 12:05:57 AM
Imagine that with a springer front end [thumbsup]
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: jerryz on June 09, 2008, 03:59:19 AM
great enginnering skill and execution but bubious taste and styling.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: psychochild on June 09, 2008, 10:50:53 AM
I really like a lot of stuff on that bike,  I think over all its not flowing together as well as a lightly modded monster but take a look at some stuff:

The under-radiator is great,  definitely has potential.

The rearsets are pretty nice, don't know how custom they are.

The exhaust routing is really cool,  + some pretty nice cans.

The linkage arm mounting the front swing arm blends in nicely to the frame.

The whole linkage steering is very nice, well executed and would probably be interesting to drive

the integration of the headlights into the tank. also cool.

overall I respect the work of another customizer, Its clean, its well assembled nothing looks gaudy or over the top,  I think if it embraced a little more of the naked bike feel,  with some additions (or subtractions to the tank and seat area, it could definitely be in my top monsters list.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: macker on June 09, 2008, 04:59:02 PM
There we go  [thumbsup] I used my remarkable photoshop skills to produce this alternative


(http://i287.photobucket.com/albums/ll127/mackdaddy16/remodeled.jpg)
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: 5891jonathan on June 10, 2008, 10:22:28 AM
Macker's chopp is a styling improvement!  I am not talking about anything here except the styling, which is ass!  Look at the tubular Monster frame with all that angular %^%$ slapped on.  It's Frankenstein's Monster!
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Popeye the Sailor on June 10, 2008, 05:42:04 PM
Quote from: roy-nexus-6 on June 08, 2008, 06:46:55 PM
I'm looking at the front end of this bike, & thinking it's not going to handle as well as a simple, straightforward handlebar-fork arrangement.

You'd be surprised at how well something like that (if designed properly) can handle. There have been arguments made that that style can be made superior to traditional forks. I won't go into it, but....that thing probably handles just fine.  :)
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: NAKID on June 10, 2008, 06:19:51 PM
Overall, I like it, but there is something about the red paint that just screams drugstore model paint...
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: macker on June 10, 2008, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: 5891jonathan on June 10, 2008, 10:22:28 AM
Macker's chopp is a styling improvement!
Thanks  [cheeky] I had spent countless hours but i think I nailed it
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: DarkStaR on June 10, 2008, 09:16:52 PM
Looks like a Bimota rip off to me.

(http://www.motorbike-search-engine.co.uk/2005_bike_pics/bimota%20tesi%202d.jpg)
(http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/Custom%20Bikes/Monster%20S4%20by%20Ferruccio%20Codutti%20%201.jpg)

Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: Centerline on June 10, 2008, 10:27:09 PM
Maybe they can use it in another Batman movie.
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: teddy037.2 on June 11, 2008, 12:16:34 AM
Quote from: NAKID on June 10, 2008, 06:19:51 PM
Overall, I like it, but there is something about the red paint that just screams drugstore model paint...

+11TB. that engine paint is horrid!
Title: Re: That poor s4
Post by: duc996 on June 11, 2008, 04:45:47 AM
I do like the pipes  :)