Ducati Monster Forum

Kitchen Sink => No Moto Content => Topic started by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 06:37:03 AM

Title: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 06:37:03 AM
Never thought id hear about something like this.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42460541/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/t/new-engine-sends-shock-waves-through-auto-industry/ (http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42460541/ns/technology_and_science-innovation/t/new-engine-sends-shock-waves-through-auto-industry/)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ungeheuer on March 28, 2013, 07:16:09 AM
..interesting.  Dont think I've quite got my mind around it though  :-\
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 07:35:32 AM
Maybe its an elaborate hoax
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ungeheuer on March 28, 2013, 07:43:37 AM
Is it April yet?
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ducpainter on March 28, 2013, 08:00:34 AM
Nothing of it in operation, that I can find.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Raux on March 28, 2013, 08:11:09 AM
Diesel rotary
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Slide Panda on March 28, 2013, 08:18:59 AM
Couple years debry. I posted about this shock front engine couple years ago Kev!

http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2011-03/shockwave-generating-wave-discs-could-replace-cars-internal-combustion-engines (http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2011-03/shockwave-generating-wave-discs-could-replace-cars-internal-combustion-engines)

Hmm the thing you link to is from 2011 too. WOnder what ever happened to this thing.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ungeheuer on March 28, 2013, 08:26:22 AM
Quote from: Slide Panda on March 28, 2013, 08:18:59 AM
WOnder what ever happened to this thing.
Hang on.....  I'll give Ralph Sarich a call  ;)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 09:50:49 AM
Quote from: Slide Panda on March 28, 2013, 08:18:59 AM
Couple years debry. I posted about this shock front engine couple years ago Kev!

http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2011-03/shockwave-generating-wave-discs-could-replace-cars-internal-combustion-engines (http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2011-03/shockwave-generating-wave-discs-could-replace-cars-internal-combustion-engines)

Hmm the thing you link to is from 2011 too. WOnder what ever happened to this thing.

Huh, 2011, didn't catch that.

GM probably bought it up and deep sixed it ;D
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ducpainter on March 28, 2013, 10:08:16 AM
Quote from: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 09:50:49 AM
Huh, 2011, didn't catch that.

GM probably bought it up and deep sixed it ;D

(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5299/5404789780_7e4448de75.jpg) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/26408631@N02/5404789780/)
tinfoil (http://www.flickr.com/photos/26408631@N02/5404789780/#) by nh_painter (http://www.flickr.com/people/26408631@N02/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 10:48:29 AM
Cause I didn't catch it came out in 2011?
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: ducpainter on March 28, 2013, 10:49:45 AM
Quote from: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 10:48:29 AM
Cause I didn't catch it came out in 2011?
No...

the GM conspiracy reference.

It was a joke. ;)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 10:58:31 AM
Gotcha

Man, imagine an sbk with a lighter frame and a shock engine that weighs very little. It would be like a 130hp 10 speed bike :D
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Speeddog on March 28, 2013, 11:14:43 AM
I saw another article that said it shoots a continuous rainbow out the exhaust pipe.

Trouble is, the only fuel it will run on is unicorn tears.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Slide Panda on March 28, 2013, 11:25:27 AM
Quote from: Speeddog on March 28, 2013, 11:14:43 AM

Trouble is, the only fuel it will run on is unicorn tears.

They debunked that. The lubricity of the tears was too low. Unicorn blood was determined the proper formulation.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Oldfisti on March 28, 2013, 11:34:44 AM
It seems like an advanced version of the Quasiturbine engine.  Everything is mechanical in this design tho.  Sort of an advanced rotary design.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiturbine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiturbine)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 11:59:02 AM
I'm not sure that will work well.

They don't even purpose to use refamulated amulite.

Really, how well could it work without that?!?
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Oldfisti on March 28, 2013, 12:10:00 PM
Quote from: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 11:59:02 AM
I'm not sure that will work well.

They don't even purpose to use refamulated amulite.

Really, how well could it work without that?!?


Probably would have unacceptable amounts of side-fumbling.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 01:09:16 PM
I'm sayin
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Slide Panda on March 28, 2013, 01:32:27 PM
Not if they used a secondary supporting sperving bearing.
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Speeddog on March 28, 2013, 03:08:33 PM
I had forgotten how awesome the Turbo-Encabulator was.  [laugh]
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 04:22:37 PM
;D
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: muskrat on March 28, 2013, 08:42:45 PM
Quote from: Monsterlover on March 28, 2013, 09:50:49 AM
GM probably bought it up and deep sixed it ;D
Exactly, just like the moto czysz.   [thumbsdown]
http://motoczysz.com/news/article/introducing_motoczysz_z-line_4_engine (http://motoczysz.com/news/article/introducing_motoczysz_z-line_4_engine)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: Dirty Duc on April 01, 2013, 03:17:28 PM
It looks like a complicated version of a Tesla turbine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_turbine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_turbine)
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: MendoDave on April 01, 2013, 05:35:06 PM
Im gonna go get all excited about this thing coming out any day now...is there a way to invest somebody else's money in it?
Title: Re: Pistonless engine
Post by: The Mad King Pepe' on April 01, 2013, 09:38:47 PM
Looks like a nice idea, but I don't expect anything to come from it for the next several years.

We've had fuel sipping Turbo Diesel engines in Europe for decades now. Thirty or so years ago there was a 9 -1 ratio between gas and diesel cars, high gas prices changed things and now it's closer to 1 - 1.

Things will change when gas prices rise closer to European levels and demand will adjust. [coffee]