News:

This Forum is not for sale

 

Another argument for through body crash protectors

Started by IdZer0, June 18, 2012, 11:34:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

IdZer0

2007 Monster 695, DP ECU, Low mount Alu Termignonis
replaced by 2011 848 EVO

DanTheMan

probably saved it from some mild bruising, but looks like a simple low side. Generally legs don't get crushed.
2008 KTM 690 SMC
2006 749 Dark- Sold
2003 M630ie Dark - Sold
2003 CRF175F
1999 Minsk 125 2T - Bought in Hanoi sold in Bangkok
1994 Ninja EX250 - Sold- AFM #692 - Retired
1996 Honda CR125R - Sold

Jester

Quote from: DanTheMan on June 18, 2012, 12:05:11 PM
probably saved it from some mild bruising, but looks like a simple low side. Generally legs don't get crushed.

+1

09’ 848     07’ S2R800

Triple J

Quote from: DanTheMan on June 18, 2012, 12:05:11 PM
probably saved it from some mild bruising, but looks like a simple low side. Generally legs don't get crushed.

+2

...and through-body sliders are famous for bending Ducati trellis frames...and/or digging in and causing the bike to tumble instead of just allowing it to slide. I'll keep my under-the-body ones.

ZLTFUL

 [roll]

The way this guy's leg was saved is the same way I could argue that my leg was ripped off (it wasn't but it could have been GAWDAMNIT!!!  ;D) because of frame sliders. My bike's frame slider caught the gap between the curbing and the grass and was sent airborne. Had my leg still been over the bike and maybe somehow my leathers tangled in the opposite side frame slider, it could have hypothetically in theory ripped my leg off.

You can make an argument for and against virtually any aspect of anything. Hell...it's how politicians make a living.  [laugh]
Avatar courtesy of www.mybadco.com
2012 Panigale 1199
2003 KTM 640 Adventure