News:

This Forum is not for sale

 

New kit for MotoGP 2013

Started by Speeddog, February 14, 2013, 12:02:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Speeddog

Seems there's been some changes over the winter....



Some rather fluffy analysis here:
http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2013/02/whats-the-deal-with-the-yamaha-m1s-new-triangle-frame/

And a bit more thoughtful analysis here:
http://gpone.com/albertocani/2013/02/12/tecnica-la-sinuosa-m1-e-la-spigolosa-honda-cosi-uguali-cosi-diverse/
Plug into Google Translate to get the slightly awkward normal service.

- - - - - Valley Desmo Service - - - - -
Reseda, CA

(951) 640-8908


~~~ "We've rearranged the deck chairs, refilled the champagne glasses, and the band sounds great. This is fine." - Alberto Puig ~~~

Raux

LMAO 

Yamaha is using the front of the Ducati GP framless and integrated it into the beam frame..  [laugh]


Triple J

Quote from: Raux on February 15, 2013, 01:34:53 AM
LMAO 

Yamaha is using the front of the Ducati GP framless and integrated it into the beam frame..  [laugh]



Meaning it's really nothing like the Ducati frameless concept.  :P

Raux

Quote from: Triple J on February 15, 2013, 08:22:10 AM
Meaning it's really nothing like the Ducati frameless concept.  :P
meaning they one-up'd ducati... oh thanks for the idea you can't figure out, we'll take it and improve it.

Triple J

Quote from: Raux on February 15, 2013, 12:05:58 PM
meaning they one-up'd ducati... oh thanks for the idea you can't figure out, we'll take it and improve it.

Not really. The Yamaha still has a frame connecting the headtube to the swingarm, whereas the D16 used the motor as the connection without a frame. Increasing the area (i.e. moment of inertia) of the head tube connection to allow for a thinner wall and also an overall stiffer structure isn't the same thing as eliminating the frame altogether. This would have happened regardless of what Ducati did, as it sounds like a more compact motor makes it possible.