News:

Welcome to the DMF

 

Boom tubes power penalty compared to other full systems?

Started by Billyzoom, February 09, 2012, 10:07:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Billyzoom

I have an S4Rs with boomtubes installed, and I don't think the bike feels quite as quick as it did with the previous full aftermarket system I had installed. 

It's not so much that I need the extra power, but I had gone to the effort of getting my ECU remapped and opened the airbox, and I'm curious how much power the boomtubes may sacrifice compared to a performance oriented full system like Termis, Arrow or Remus.  To be honest, they look so good I'm likely going to stick with them, but some actual data would help make the decision.

My understanding is that boomtubes DO sacrifice some power versus quality full exhaust systems.  My question is, roughly how much power might I be losing for a bike like mine with the aforementioned mods?

Thanks for any info.

Joel

Raux

I had always wondered if torque cones would help the boomtubes. they help the shorty exhausts on HDs


uglyducky

Quote from: Billyzoom on February 09, 2012, 10:07:26 PM
I have an S4Rs with boomtubes installed, and I don't think the bike feels quite as quick as it did with the previous full aftermarket system I had installed. 

It's not so much that I need the extra power, but I had gone to the effort of getting my ECU remapped and opened the airbox, and I'm curious how much power the boomtubes may sacrifice compared to a performance oriented full system like Termis, Arrow or Remus.  To be honest, they look so good I'm likely going to stick with them, but some actual data would help make the decision.

My understanding is that boomtubes DO sacrifice some power versus quality full exhaust systems.  My question is, roughly how much power might I be losing for a bike like mine with the aforementioned mods?

Thanks for any info.

Joel
~10 hp (give or take) from what i have read/been told. 
2008 S4RS - Tricolore #324 (about to get bastardized)
2007 S4RS - pearl/red with some tweaks (sold)
2005 S4R - Bastarda Nera (sold)
2001 M900Sie modded to high holy hell (sold)
2001 996 Biposto - (sold)
dirtypunkysocalreggae . . . MANDORiCO

uglyducky

kicking around doing the same thing with the same bike. 
2008 S4RS - Tricolore #324 (about to get bastardized)
2007 S4RS - pearl/red with some tweaks (sold)
2005 S4R - Bastarda Nera (sold)
2001 M900Sie modded to high holy hell (sold)
2001 996 Biposto - (sold)
dirtypunkysocalreggae . . . MANDORiCO

DucHead

A search will tell you that you'll lose a few ponies on the top end, but does it really matter?  If you want a lot of horsepower, you own the wrong bike.

P.S. I've been running boom tubes for a few years, and I have no complaints about power loss.
'05 S4R (>47k mi); '04 Bandit 1200 (>92k mi; sold); '02 Bandit 1200 (>11k mi); '97 Bandit 1200 (2k mi); '13 FJR1300 (1k mi); IBA #28454 "45"

Billyzoom

Quote from: DucHead on February 10, 2012, 05:56:36 PM
A search will tell you that you'll lose a few ponies on the top end, but does it really matter?  If you want a lot of horsepower, you own the wrong bike.

P.S. I've been running boom tubes for a few years, and I have no complaints about power loss.


I established that I knew there were some ponies lost.  I established that it really didn't matter, but I was curious about specifics.

My search turned up no meaningful data, just vague impressions similar to mine.  If you have some actual data, posting that would be helpful. 

I think most people would agree that 130ish horsepower for a motorcycle, though subjective, would generally be considered "a lot". 

Your lack of complaint about power loss isn't particularly relevant to what I was asking.






DucNaked

"If your bike is quiter than mine your a pussy, if it's louder you're an asshole." Monster 1100S