News:

This Forum is not for sale

 

Is a Nichols crankcase breather better?

Started by ejw24, August 01, 2008, 08:48:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ejw24

Is there a difference between the stock crankcase breather and the Nichols?  If not, what is the benefit of the Nichols?  I have the K&N breather filter on the stock set-up now, get a bit of oil mist on the filter when I ride hard, will the Nichols eliminate that?
I'm having a failure to thrive...

knightrider

the quality is definetly better, i was getting leakage around my breather because the plastic would spin in the metal body, so the oil would seep out the edges.  what you could try first is to maybe put a length of hose  on the breather then the breather filter, it will give the oil that gets by the flapper time to drain back into the engine before getting caught in the filter.
1994 M900

bullet boy

I have had a K&N attached directly to a Nichols on my 620 for at least 10K/mi. and it has never misted.

Norm

I've used Nichols, stock, and VeeTwo, and my best answer to your question would be: "I don't know".
You should definatly NOT attach the filter directly to the breather, it's job is to vent misty oil under pressure & you should put the filter at the end of a hose, the longer the better, but I make mine about 8-12 inches.

ejw24

Quote from: Norm on August 02, 2008, 07:50:25 AM
I've used Nichols, stock, and VeeTwo, and my best answer to your question would be: "I don't know".
You should definatly NOT attach the filter directly to the breather, it's job is to vent misty oil under pressure & you should put the filter at the end of a hose, the longer the better, but I make mine about 8-12 inches.

Thanks for the info.  I have mine on a hose, abut 6 inches long.  Going to work on a longer hose/set-up.
I'm having a failure to thrive...