This thing actually has a shot at passing. It would essentially make lane splitting legal in Maricopa county starting Dec. 31 2010. 

http://www.azleg.gov/DocumentsForBill.asp?Bill_Number=2475&image.x=0&image.y=0

I've been watching that....I wonder who's backing/lobbying for it? What kind of public awareness they're planning, if any. Without some organized counter information, the thing will blow up if the press starts talking to the GAAMs about it. Personally, I'm ready to no longer have to contribute to the congestion nor have to worry about getting rear ended any more.

I think it's a good idea and a bad one all at the same time. As often and severe as motorcycle accidents already are in Phoenix, I wonder how much they'd increase because of something like this.

On the flip side -  I'd much rather not get stuck in traffic in 120 degree heat when I could just cut right through it.

I don't think I could do it. My mirrors stick out too much.

Quote from: Michael on March 30, 2010, 12:23:33 PM
I don't think I could do it. My mirrors stick out too much.

Maybe if you rode side saddle?   

Quote from: Monster Dave on March 30, 2010, 10:28:43 AM
I think it's a good idea and a bad one all at the same time. As often and severe as motorcycle accidents already are in Phoenix, I wonder how much they'd increase because of something like this.

On the flip side -  I'd much rather not get stuck in traffic in 120 degree heat when I could just cut right through it.

Well we have three examples we can look at:

• Most of the Industrialized Nations of the world, as well as Texas
  In these places lane splitting, is done within tight rules that generally state you must be within 5mph of the flow of traffic and you must merge into the flow when the flow of traffic is above 30mph (varies from place to place, metric system conversions are nearly the same)
• California which dosen't "allow" lane splitting, they simply don't have a law prohibiting it and choose to allow it. But most California cops will give you a hard time if you are splitting like an idiot. There a number of other states that also don't have laws against lane splitting, but use other laws to ensnare riders who lane split.
• Arizona's Proposed rule says that traffic must be stopped, but doesn't say how fast the bike must be going through the stopped traffic.

When done smartly and by Texas, or European, Australian, Japanese rules, is perfectly safe and a fine idea that is usually implemented with rider safety as it's primary goal. Rear-end collisions when traffic slows is the number one accident in the world. 99% of the time, nobody gets hurt in a rear-end fender bender involving two cars. When it's a motorbike that gets rear-ended, there's little chance that the rider will not get injured. Allowing the rider to get out of the line of such common collisions is smart and proper. The benefit of easing congestion and the even bigger benefit to the rider of not having to wait in heavy traffic are just icing on the cake, but don't forget that the cake is rider safety.

Yea yea...we keep hearing the panicked bleating of the GAAM, "What happens when some driver flings his door open?" or "What about some driver suddenly changing lanes in front of the bike that's passing between lanes?" I've been hearing these two arguments for years. Where lane splitting is done right, there are so few cases of problems that endanger riders as to not be worth mention. Who flings their door open while sitting in a long line at a red light? Cars that are stuck side-by-side in traffic aren't changing lanes.

Read. The internet is full of good information on this topic.

Thanks

I successfully lane split in California for many years (Oakland/SF).
It's terribly handy in rush-hour traffic and at stop lights.
At a stop you filter up front - the cars are already stopped so less chance of getting rear ended.

When I lived in Chicago I lane split for a couplea years. Totally illegal, but I'm impatient.  
A job I worked was up north. This particular highway had all the jerks.
(I never had this problem on other highways in Chicago-land)
I'd lane split on the way home through the stop-go traffic.
(completely stopped for periods of time. It was an awful commute.)
In the six months I was working there, I had at least four cars open their doors on me.
I had a semi try to run me off the road. Really. Out of it's way to try to squish me. That was fun.
If I hadn't been filtering slowly and carefully, I would have gotten injured by one of those doors
(as it was, they just got an ear full. So did the semi driver. Grr.).

Like all riding, you just gotta be extra aware of your surroundings.
And unlike my Chicago experience, I never had a driver open a car door on me in Oakland, SF, Vancouver B.C., or Austin Tx.

Like anything new, it'll take a little while for cars to get used to it.
It'll take bikes time to get used to it.
After a while, it'll just be the norm.

Quote from: Michael on March 30, 2010, 12:23:33 PM
I don't think I could do it. My mirrors stick out too much.

Just your mirrors?

Quote from: hoyden on March 30, 2010, 02:38:05 PM
In the six months I was working there, I had at least four cars open their doors on me.
I had a semi try to run me off the road. Really. Out of it's way to try to squish me. That was fun.

Who was that dumb azz DJ in CA who told his listeners to open up their car doors on motorcyclists splitting traffic? 

Why is it such a race to every stoplight..especially here in PHX?! 

I see people speed up to the spot where oncoming traffic is going to merge only to cut off the merging car.  Why?

American cagers, in general..are just azzholes.   

Quote from: IZ on March 30, 2010, 03:14:49 PM
Who was that dumb azz DJ in CA who told his listeners to open up their car doors on motorcyclists splitting traffic?  
Why is it such a race to every stoplight..especially here in PHX?!  
I see people speed up to the spot where oncoming traffic is going to merge only to cut off the merging car.  Why?
American cagers, in general..are just azzholes.    

I don't know. It is really awful.

I don't think those people really understand what kind of damage could ensue from opening their door on a motorcyclist. One car that did it to me was four young (college-age) guys. When I stopped my bike and started in on them, they were surprised that I was female. I asked them (loudly) if they understood that by having their little fun and opening the door on me could have killed me. Did they really want to seriously damage another human just because that person was getting ahead of them in traffic? They just shrugged their shoulders.


And back to our regularly scheduled program... 
What's the process with that Bill?

I did it for years in SF without incident.  Just a matter of getting drivers used to the idea.  I would often split on the freeway in slow traffic as well.  Just gotta keep the situational awarness dial tured up to 10.  I know I pay more attention, can stop harder and accelerate faster than 99.99% of cages.  So I say bring on the lane-splitting.  I don't ride motorcycles because of of their reputation as safe transportation anyway. [moto]  

When we passed through LA on our Monsters I found lane splitting to be.....useful 



However, when we stopped Maureen said to me "you know honey, you don't need to lane split when traffic is already moving at the speed limit" 


Awe shucks - she probably saved me from my own over-excitement, but MAN that was fun!

Quote from: Monster Dave on March 30, 2010, 06:59:25 PM
When we passed through LA on our Monsters I found lane splitting to be.....useful 
However, when we stopped Maureen said to me "you know honey, you don't need to lane split when traffic is already moving at the speed limit" 
Awe shucks - she probably saved me from my own over-excitement, but MAN that was fun!

Uh huh.. A lot of fun!  Dangerous? Yes, but..as previously mentioned..that's what we do! 

http://www.motorcycledaily.com/30march10_lanesplitting.htm


More news, sort of.

Yay! I love the picture of French bikers..