News:

Welcome to the DMF

 

Ducati to be Sold

Started by Travman, August 11, 2008, 05:59:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Travman

A newly created investment group composed of Ducati's three largest shareholdersâ€"Investindustrial, BS Investimenti and Hospitals of Ontario Pension Plan (HOPP)â€"would purchase the 70 percent of publicly traded stock that they don't already own for about $579 million. The stock purchase would cause publicly held Ducati (stock ticker: DMH) to be delisted from public trading and become 100 percent privately held. The plan should be approved by Ducati's board in September and has already been approved by Italy's regulatory bodies.

Here is the complete article:
http://www.cycleworld.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=853

So is this a good thing?  Does it even matter to us everyday Ducatisti?

Raux

i would say not a good thing. a publicly traded company is owing to its stock holders to make the right choices.. including giving us what we want at a good price... a private company... it does what it wants for how much it wants.. and if doesnt' make money.. it goes dead.

supertjeduc

I think a public owned company wants short therm profit
A private owned company wants long therm profit
So private is better for the company ,public better for shareholders

mmakay

Company ownership should not be confused with company management.  Lamborghini is publically owned.  Does the Ghallardo lack passion, or disappoint?
- Mickey

Raux

exactly... how many times through the years when Lambo was privately held, did it almost die.

sh

This would be a good move for Ducati.

They'll save a huge amount of money being a private company.  No need for armies of lawyers to create all the bureaucracy required to operate a public company. 

They'll be able to act faster and take calculated risks without being subject to fickle public markets.

I'd expect better and more innovative products from a private Ducati.
2005 749 Dark
2004 Monster 620ie (sold)
1992 900 SS

derby

Quote from: Raux on August 11, 2008, 06:20:03 PM
i would say not a good thing. a publicly traded company is owing to its stock holders to make the right choices.. including giving us what we want at a good price... a private company... it does what it wants for how much it wants.. and if doesnt' make money.. it goes dead.

what does that have to do with anything? the only "duty" a public company has is to it's shareholders.

-- derby

'07 Suz GSX-R750

Retired rides: '05 Duc Monster S4R, '99 Yam YZF-R1, '98 Hon CBR600F3, '97 Suz GSX-R750, '96 Hon CBR600F3, '94 Hon CBR600F2, '91 Hon Hawk GT, '91 Yam YSR-50, '87 Yam YSR-50

click here for info about my avatar

Ivan

It may be that the current group of owners/investors consider the company to be undervalued with respect to what they perceive as the future growth prospects, so they are going to buy all of the outstanding stock shares.  This is usually a good sign, they must be making money in order to come up with the cash for the buyback (unless they are borrowing cash to  finance the purchase).  In the future, if they need to raise capital they can always offer shares for sale again to the public.
Sold: 2007 S2R1000 for canyon carving and commuting - DP ECU, PCIII, BMC air filter with open box, Zard full exhaust, Race-tech fork internals, Ohlins steering damper, and a Penske 8987 triple clicker

2000 996XU (extra ugly) for track days - BST carbon wheels, Ohlins shock, reworked fork, FBF exhaust, and a bunch of megacycle rocker arms. The rest of it is junk - Hey, I'm just happy that it runs...

Sold: 2002 Aprilia RST1000 for touring - De-restricted airbox, Taylormade Racing exhaust

SP3

Quote from: derby on August 11, 2008, 08:05:07 PM
what does that have to do with anything? the only "duty" a public company has is to it's shareholders.




Spot on.
1991 851 SP3
1966 250 Monza
1999 Monster 900 City